Good to see a thread like this. I once posted about a similar idea on Abandonia, and got my ass handed to me.
Except, some of the forum mods at Abandonia were preaching ideals like, and keep in mind this was an abandonware community, pirating games from 20 years old is like *stealing a car from somebody*.
People (in the retro gaming community) have all kinds of idiotic views about IP, copyright, abandonware and it's highly frustrating. The very notion of paying for something we've mostly all paid for a zillion times (how many times have I bought a SQ4 disk or CD version? I shudder to think), is abhorrent to me.
Especially when the money goes to GOG or Acti.
I don't have a problem with forum mods in places keeping it somewhat hush hush so their forum doesn't get closed. That's smart business (smarter than me apparently). But lots of forums won't allow any discussion about it whatsoever. You would think, especially as time has marched on, the percentage of people who played, say, SQ4 in the last decade mostly pirated the game versus buying it on eBay/Amazon/Galaxy Galleria Mall.
So by shutting out these people, you would think this shuts out later-adopting fans of adventure games.
Now, I take Collector's point. But guys like Crowe and Murphy, and Al Lowe/etc, are making money in new ways, they're not basing new IP off of sales of collections on Amazon (at least I hope not).
I also would think that Activision would put a higher price on IP that is popular, rather than one that people are pirating and they're not getting any revenue anyway. But we're getting into longbow territory now, and not a Conquest-brand one (whoops, QFG joke not SQ).
Rant over! Poke holes as needed.